Screw Fixation versus Arthroplasty versus Plate Fixation for 3-Part Radial Head Fractures
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Screw fixation versus arthroplasty versus plate fixation for 3-part radial head fractures.
PURPOSE To compare the outcome following headless compression screw fixation versus radial head arthroplasty versus plate fixation for 3-part Mason types III or IV radial head fracture. METHODS Records of 25 men and 16 women aged 21 to 80 (mean, 43.3) years who underwent fixation using 2 to 3 2-mm cannulated headless compression screws (n=16), radial head arthroplasty (n=13), or fixation with...
متن کاملComparison of crossed screw versus plate fixation for radial neck fractures.
BACKGROUND Fixation of radial neck fractures can be achieved with a plate and screw construct or, in absence of comminution, with two obliquely-oriented screws. This study investigated the mechanical properties, specifically the stiffness and load to failure, of these two fixation strategies in a cadaver model. METHODS Ten matched-pair radii were removed from fresh cadaver arms. A transverse ...
متن کاملfixation of intertrochanteric fractures: dynamic hip screw versus locking compression plate
conclusions despite the complications of fixation with the dhs device, it remains the most successful for treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. background according to the existing literature, the dynamic hip screw (dhs) is the preferred standard for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. however, some surgeons use other devices such as the locking compression plate (lcp). objectives...
متن کاملThe Best Option in Treatment of Modified Mason Type III Radial Head Fractures: Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Versus Radial Head Excision
Background: Radial head fractures commonly occur during elbow traumas. Among those, treatment of Mason type IIIfractures is still under controversy. Common treatment methods for these fractures include open reduction and internalfixation (ORIF) as well as radial head excision. In this study, we compared long-term outcomes of both methods intreatment of patients with Mason type III fractures of ...
متن کاملOpen intramedullary Kirschner wire versus screw and plate fixation for unstable forearm fractures in children.
PURPOSE To compare the outcomes of intramedullary Kirschner wire versus screw and plate fixation for unstable forearm fractures in children aged older than 10 years. METHODS Records of 32 children aged 10 to 15 (mean, 12) years with displaced fractures of the radius and ulna were retrospectively reviewed. 17 boys and 4 girls underwent intramedullary Kirschner wiring, whereas 10 boys and one g...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
سال: 2016
ISSN: 2309-4990,2309-4990
DOI: 10.1177/230949901602400114